the corporation

• konuyla ilgili bir iktisat-phd ogrencisinin yorumuda soyledir,
  "(...)
  of course corporations have done bad things, and corporations need to be regulated. in this regard the film does make a fundamental point: corporations have no incentive to consider the public good in conducting their business. a system that expects corporations to consider the public good in their private affairs will not work. figuring out how to make corporations care about national welfare is an important question. it’s a complicated question with a complicated answer.
  (...)
  the movie ridicules the idea of “privatizing the air.” by privatizing the air the film means market based mechanisms for trading pollution amounts. i am not an expert in this area, but kaj thomsson (an environmental econ guy) has told me that these systems generally work well. the logic is that you cap the total amount of emissions and then let a market allocate which firms pollute the most. the cap part keeps the total level of emissions in check, and the market part gives pollution rights to firms that produce the most value from polluting. the level of the cap is a tough question, and one that merits discussion. but to liken this system to one where corporations own everything, hinting at a world where we’d pay for the air we breathe, is idiocy.
  (...)"
  tamami icin,
  http://pantheon.yale.edu/~ssa24/corporation.htm